Finance, accounting and ERP
Invoice and document processing, reconciliation, order to cash, multi currency. Where errors are most expensive and audit trails matter.
Integration engineering
n8n workflow automation services
You already chose n8n. So the question is not what it can do. The question is what happens at three in the morning when a workflow fails, whether anything tells you, and whether the retry creates a second invoice.
01
Trigger
02
Validate
03
Enrich
timeout 30s · retry 2 of 3
DL
Dead letter
04
Write
idempotency ondead letter enabledalert on outcome
15+ yearsSystems integration since 2011
50+ specialistsEngineers on staff
What happens when it breaks?
Pick a failure. The middle column is what a template does. The right column is what we build instead. These eight are the questions technical buyers put in their own job postings, which is where we got the list.
Send us a workflow that keeps failing
Show us one that breaks, or one process still done by hand. Before any contract you get back:
Where it fails
And whether the failure is silent, which it usually is.
What a retry would duplicate
This is normally the expensive discovery.
What is missing
Timeout, bounded retry, idempotency key, deduplication check, dead letter path, approval gate. Named, not hand waved.
Whether n8n is even the right home
Sometimes part of it belongs in code, and we will say which part.
If your answer is that nothing is broken yet, that is useful too. It usually means nothing is monitored.
Why we do not call ourselves an AI automation agency
Search for an n8n agency and four of the top ten results are threads asking whether the category is a scam, or people announcing they are getting out of it. That reputation was earned: a course, a template library, cold outreach, a demo automating something nobody needed.
Our work is integration engineering. n8n is a good orchestration layer for a lot of it and the wrong tool for some of it, and we tell you which before you pay us.
| The pitch you have probably had | What we do |
|---|---|
| A template library and a node count | Discovery on your real process, including the exceptions that live in one person's head |
| An impressive demo | An automation for a process that costs money when it goes wrong |
| Set it and forget it | A maintenance arrangement, because APIs, credentials, schemas and business rules all keep moving |
| We can automate any business | A specific answer about your systems, sometimes recommending code instead |
| Hours saved, quoted before anything is measured | A baseline first, then the same measure afterwards, with review and maintenance effort subtracted |
The work we take
Finance, CRM, IT ops, cross-system jobs, auditable documents, and AI steps that stay inside a deterministic workflow—not a black box that owns the process.
CRM lifecycle
Lead capture, routing, deduplication, enrichment, follow up, handoff between sales and delivery.
IT and internal operations
Onboarding and offboarding, provisioning, ticket creation, alert enrichment, escalation.
Cross system operations
Orders, jobs, inventory and status moving between legacy and modern systems that disagree about identifiers.
Auditable document processing
Where you have to show what came in, what was decided, who approved it and how exceptions were handled.
AI steps inside a deterministic workflow
Extraction, classification, drafting, triage. Validated output, confidence thresholds, human review. One controlled step, not the owner of the process.
Where n8n stops and code starts
We move logic out of n8n when it is a heavy loop, a large file, a big transformation, complex long lived state, a strict transaction boundary, or anything latency sensitive. n8n coordinates well and computes badly.
Our default is n8n as the visible orchestration layer with the demanding work in versioned code services, and you get the diagram showing where that line sits and why.
Any agency that answers “never” when you ask this question has no architectural opinion. When not to use n8n
Start with one workflow
Most buyers start with the pilot and that is the right instinct. One bounded workflow, fixed price, fixed timeline, and a real decision at the end.
Pilot
One workflow, fixed price and timeline
From $5,000
Multi-system
Integration across systems of record
$15,000–$25,000
Portfolio
Multiple workflows with managed support
From $25,000
Support
Monthly change and incident coverage
Priced separately
What moves the number
How many systems and whether each is read or write, whether a system of record is involved, source data quality, whether approvals or audit trails are required, how much belongs in code, and whether we are building or rescuing.
Not included, and it catches people out
n8n's own licence. Cloud starts at €20 a month, the self hosted Business plan is €667 a month, and the governance features most production setups need sit on the higher tiers. We check which tier your requirements actually need during discovery and put it in the proposal.
Why this is not $90
Because $90 buys the canvas. What you are paying us for is the discovery that finds the exceptions, the failure design in the widget above, the security work, the testing, the environment separation, the documentation, and somebody answering when it breaks. If you genuinely only need the canvas, buy the canvas.
Who is awake
Monitoring, severity, coverage hours, named owners, safe replay, change control, and a dependency inventory your team actually holds.
| Monitoring | Business level checks. An alert when the thing that should have happened did not, rather than only when a node went red |
| Severity levels | Defined, each with a response target |
| Coverage hours | Stated plainly. If it is not genuinely overnight we say so |
| Incident owner | Named, on both sides |
| Replay | Documented, tested, and safe to run twice |
| Change control | Dev, staging and production separated. Version pinning, smoke tests, rollback. Nobody edits a live canvas |
| Dependency inventory | Every API, credential, spreadsheet and schema the workflow relies on, handed to your team |
| Excluded causes | Written down, so the line between a defect and an upstream change is not argued about later |
That last row exists because of the most common failure we see: someone renames a spreadsheet column, or changes a form field, with no idea anything depends on it. The fix is governance, not code, which is why the dependency inventory goes to your team rather than into a folder.
What we can actually show you
We do not have a published n8n case study. What we have is production integration work of the kind these workflows depend on. If that is not enough for you, that is a fair position to take.
SAP across three company databases
Three databases, three currencies, one integrated source of truth. The work was data mapping, reconciliation, and business rules that differed per entity. This is the category where a duplicate or a dropped record has a financial consequence.
Queue based imports with cancellation and live progress
Long running jobs a user can start, watch and cancel, on Celery and RabbitMQ. Asynchronous processing, state handling, back pressure, operational visibility while work is in flight. The same architecture question as any workflow that runs longer than a request.
Cross-system CRM and operational workflows
Custom CRM platforms where lead routing, status sync, and operational handoffs have to survive duplicate events, partial writes, and third-party outages—the same failure modes n8n production workflows face.
CLIENT REVIEWS
What Our Clients Say
“Attract Group's efforts resulted in a bug-free app that beta users could easily navigate. The team provided frequent updates on their progress and was highly accommodating throughout the engagement. Attract Group was organized and responsive.”
“Attract Group provides outstaffing services for a fintech company. They take the time to better understand our requirements and provide the best options. Attract Group delivers on time, and their communication is quick.”
“Attract Group has deployed top-notch professionals who manage the project efficiently and ensure timely delivery of outputs. They also impress us with their transparency in their technical skills and business consulting values.”
01–03 / 06 CURATED · 39 TOTAL ON CLUTCH
FAQ
Six questions we always get
Straight answers on lock-in, pricing, hosting, and when n8n is the wrong tool.
Monitoring that alerts on outcomes rather than node errors, severity levels with response targets, a named incident owner on each side, and a replay procedure that is safe to run. Our coverage hours are in the contract, and if they are not genuinely overnight we say so.
Ready to harden your n8n workflows?
Tell us about the workflow that keeps failing, or the process still done by hand. We'll respond with where it fails and what a retry would duplicate.
Or call us directly:+1 888-438-4988